Quickly Rutledge and others would set up multiple mirrored versions of the videos on several different video sharing websites, and they remain widely available.īut did NASA, or anyone, really need to worry? For many the story was simply too incredible to be believable. Was NASA trying to destroy the evidence of this most secret of missions? But soon after he claims his account was hacked and the videos deleted. Understandably, due to the sensational nature of the videos, Rutledge’s posts to Youtube gathered millions of hits. The major conclusions of the exploration were: it was a mothership, very old, that crossed the universe at least a billion years ago”. Rutledge also described the ship - “We went inside the big spaceship, also into a triangular one. In an interview with Italian journalist Luca Scantamburlo, Rutledge went into more details about their discovery of Mona Lisa, explaining that the EBE - Extraterrestrial Biological Entity, appeared to be neither alive or dead, but in some kind of state of suspended animation.Īccording to Rutledge, the alien was disconnected from the navigational device and returned back to Earth aboard the lunar module, where the body still resides today. The alien body supposedly found by the Apollo 20 crew She appeared to be locked into the controls of the spacecraft by a device connected to her eyes and nose. The videos then cut to the Apollo 20 crew actually exploring the interior of the crashed ship, and perhaps most amazingly of all discovering the body of a human-like alien.ĭubbed ‘Mona Lisa’ by the astronauts, the body appeared to have been that of a young woman, partially mummified with a thin layer of a waxy substance covering its skin. Rutledge’s footage would be astonishing if true, as it shows both the alien city and a flyover of the cigar-shaped spaceship. Retiredafb identified himself as William Rutledge, a now elderly and retired Nasa astronaut, in exile in Rwanda, who took part in the secret Apollo 20 mission alongside fellow astronauts Leona Marietta Snyder and Alexei Leonov.Īccording to Rutledge, Apollo 20's mission was to explore the polar region of the Moon, on its dark side, to investigate images supposedly taken by Apollo 15 of the area which showed what appeared to be a vast ancient city and a huge, miles-long crashed spacecraft. In 2007, a mysterious figure took to video sharing website Youtube with evidence that this incredible scenario was not speculative fiction, but a clandestine fact, one hidden from the world to protect the truth about what they had found on Earth’s closest neighbour.Ī user calling himself retiredafb posted a number of videos purporting to be footage of a secret Apollo 20 mission, jointly manned by US and Soviet astronauts, that took place in August 1976. And maybe we would have explored the dark side of the Moon, long rumoured to contain remnants of an ancient alien civilization.
Perhaps we would have habitable colonies on the Moon today, or staging posts for trips to Mars. Science fiction can speculate on what would have happened if these programs had gone ahead. Apollo 17 was the last official moon mission Official history tells is that the last time man ever went to the Moon was in December 1972, when Apollo 17 astronauts Eugene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt spent a record breaking three days on the lunar surface.īut more Apollo missions were originally planned - Apollo 18, 19 and 20 having already begun construction or in the latter planning stages when they were cancelled in 1972, a combination of declining public interest and budget cuts making the once prestigious moon program fall out of favour in Washington. We can only imagine what alternative history would have unfolded if the program hadn’t been cancelled, but continued to explore the Moon. One such speculative tale revolves around a subject already heady with conspiracy and legend - the Apollo moon landings. Little grips people’s imaginations like stories of what might have been, alternative histories where zeppelins fill the skies, the Nazis won WW2 and JFK was never assassinated.
0 kommentar(er)
